
ops.supplier-review-yearly·versija 1.0.0·melnraksts1 jāpārbauda
Katram galvenajam piegādātājam ir aktuāls atbildīgais, pārbaudīta cena un līgums, riska piezīme, un nepieciešamās pārrunas ir uzsāktas.
The yearly review of suppliers the business depends on. Not for adding a supplier — use ops.new-supplier. Not for watching one contract's renewal date through the year — use ops.contract-renewal-watch; this review is the once-a-year pass that feeds it. Not for approving a single purchase — use ops.purchase-approval.
money.month-close has run for the recent months; unreconciled spend makes the numbers wrong).Jebkurš solis var gaidīt līdz datumam un atveras pats; katrs noslēgts solis atstāj pierādījumu (piezīmi, saiti, skaitli).
Pull every supplier paid in the last 12 months from the books; merge with the agreements module register. Attach 12-month spend, last invoice date, and the named relationship owner (or "none").
Izdarīts, kad one list covers all paid suppliers, each with spend and an owner or "none".
Mark a supplier key if it meets the owner's definition (high spend or operational dependence). Mark tail if spend is trivial and switching is easy. Everything else is standard.
Izdarīts, kad every supplier has exactly one class, and the key list is short enough to review in one sitting (typically under 15).
For each key and standard supplier, compare unit prices and total spend year over year. Flag: spend up more than the agreed index, prices changed without a signed change, invoices with no contract behind them.
Izdarīts, kad each key and standard supplier has a one-line note: stable · up (by how much) · down · no contract found.
For each key supplier, read the contract for: end date, notice period, auto-renewal clause, price-change mechanism, termination rights, liability cap. Note any contract expiring within 12 months.
Izdarīts, kad each key supplier has: end date (or "indefinite"), notice period, and a flag if the renewal window opens within 12 months.
⛔ An "indefinite" contract with a 3-month notice is not safe — the notice date still controls when the company can leave.
Apstiprinājums · S5 · īpašnieks — izpilde apstājas, līdz nosaukts cilvēks ieraksta lēmumu
Present per key supplier: spend trend, contract health, risk note, and proposed action — renegotiate · accept · replace · terminate. The owner names an action per supplier and a deadline for each.
Izdarīts, kad every key supplier has one owner decision with a date.
For renegotiations: prepare the questions (price, terms, service levels) and send them from the owner's or a role mailbox — the agent does not commit to any price. For terminations: calculate the last date the notice can be sent and put it in the contract renewal watch. For replacements: note that a search is needed — that is a separate run, not part of this review.
Izdarīts, kad each decided action exists as a task with an owner and a date, and every termination deadline is in the watch.
For each key supplier, ask: if this supplier stopped today, what breaks and how fast can we switch? Write one line per supplier; where the answer is "nothing to switch to", note it as a risk with a proposed mitigation (second supplier, stock buffer, own capability).
Izdarīts, kad every key supplier has a fallback line — even if the line is "none; accepted by owner in S5".
Store the review: list, scores, decisions, fallback lines. Schedule next year's run. Send the owner a summary: how many reviewed, what changed, what is now being watched.
Izdarīts, kad the review document is stored, the next yearly trigger is set, and the summary is sent.
ops.contract-renewal-watch will fire).| Pazīme | Rīcība |
|---|---|
| Spend data does not match the supplier list | A supplier is paid under a different name or through an expense route; reconcile first, rerun S1 — do not review on partial numbers. |
| Contract missing for a key supplier | The company is on informal terms; treat as "no contract", flag as a risk, and decide in S5 whether to paper it now. |
| Auto-renewal window already open | Send the notice decision to the owner the same day; the notice deadline governs, not the review calendar. |
| Owner cannot decide on a supplier | Keep the previous arrangement, record the open question with a revisit date, do not let it block the rest of the review. |
| Renegotiation stalls past the deadline | Escalate to the owner with the alternative (replace or terminate) priced; do not let it drift into next year's review. |
The supplier list with spend figures and date of extraction · per-supplier review notes · the owner's decisions from S5 (who, when, what) · contract excerpts for end dates and notice periods · tasks opened in S6 · the summary sent to the owner.
After every run ask: what share of key suppliers got a decision (target: all)? How many price changes had happened without anyone noticing before this review? Did any action from last year's review stay open — and did the same finding repeat, which means the step that should have closed it is weak? Did any auto-renewal still surprise the company? A new version changes the step behind the repeat finding and says so in its change note.
Nosaukums un kopsavilkums ir latviski. Detalizētā izpildes kārtība pagaidām ir kanoniskajā angļu valodas versijā; juridiskos un finanšu soļus publicēsim latviski tikai pēc cilvēka pārbaudes.
Obligātās sīkdatnes tur sarunu kopā. Analītika ir izslēgta, līdz tu atļauj — tā neliek nevienu sīkdatni un neglabā ierīces identifikatoru.Necessary storage keeps your conversation together. Analytics is off until you allow it — it sets no cookie and stores no device identifier. Ko mēs glabājamWhat we store