Izpētīt jebkuru Eiropas uzņēmumu

Kad izmantot

Someone needs to know who a company really is before the company acts on it. Not for monitoring a company already in the registry watch — use company.registry-watch, which fires on changes instead of answering once. Not for checking whether a specific claim about a company is true — use agents.verify-claim, which starts from the claim, not the company.

Pirms sāc

• The question is written down: "can we sell to them", "can they pay us", "who is behind them". A dossier
• The identifier is pinned in S1 before anything else is gathered.
• Paid extracts or credit reports cost money — they happen only after the approval in S7 if needed.

Ko izpilde pieprasa1

Ceļš8 soļi

1. S1

   Pin the identityaģents

   Search the company register of the country the company claims to be in. Match on registration number, not name.

   Izdarīts, kad the dossier has one record: full legal name, registration number, country, legal form, status (active / liquidating / struck off), registered address and the date the register shows.

   ⛔ Two companies with the same name in one country is common. If the number cannot be confirmed, stop and ask the owner — do not pick the best-looking match.

2. S2

   Record the registry factsaģents

   From the same register: incorporation date, board members and their roles, share capital where published, filing history (last annual report filed).

   Izdarīts, kad each fact has the register and the date it was read. ⚠ jāpārbauda which fields a country's register publishes free of charge and which need a paid extract — check the register's own price list, never quote a fee from memory.

3. S3

   Check VAT and cross-border statusaģents

   If the company claims an EU VAT number, check it in VIES and record the result with the date.

   Izdarīts, kad the dossier says valid / invalid / not checked, with the date.

4. S4

   Trace ownershipaģents

   Follow the register to the owners; if the country publishes beneficial owners, read them there.

   Izdarīts, kad the dossier lists owners and, where published, beneficial owners — or states plainly "not published in this register" and what was tried.

   ⛔ An aggregator's ownership graph is a hint, not a source. Every named person or company needs the register that shows it.

5. S5

   Pull financial signalsaģents

   Read the filed annual reports the register offers: revenue, profit/loss, equity, filing lateness.

   Izdarīts, kad the dossier has 2–3 years of the key figures as filed, or a note that nothing is filed yet (new company) or that filing is not public in that country. ⚠ jāpārbauda which company sizes file publicly in the target country — thresholds differ per country; check the register or the country's accounting rules before claiming "they hide their numbers".

6. S6

   Run the risk flagsaģents

   Check: insolvency or liquidation entries in the register; the company and its owners in EU and national sanctions lists; adverse news from at least two independent sources; domain and website sanity (does the site match the legal name, is it recently registered).

   Izdarīts, kad each flag is marked clear / found / not checkable, with what was searched and when.

   ⛔ "No news found" is only a result if the searches are named. Silent gaps are not clear flags.

7. S7

   Decide the depth and the audienceīpašnieksvajag apstiprinājumu · īpašnieks

   Apstiprinājums · S7 · īpašnieks — izpilde apstājas, līdz nosaukts cilvēks ieraksta lēmumu

   Present the dossier so far with the confidence statement. The owner decides: is this enough, is a paid registry extract or credit report needed, and who outside the company may see it.

   Izdarīts, kad the owner has answered all three in writing in the dossier.

   ⛔ The agent never buys a paid report, contacts the target company, or sends the dossier to anyone outside the company without this step.

8. S8

   Finish and fileaģents

   If approved, order the paid extract, merge it in, and complete the dossier. Link it to the decision it serves (offer, contract, deal record).

   Izdarīts, kad the dossier is filed in company-intel, linked, and the requester has received a summary of five lines or fewer: who they are, who owns them, can they pay, risk flags, confidence.

Pārbaudes — kā zinām, ka izdevās

• Registration number in the dossier matches the register, read back on the day of the run.
• Every fact carries a source and a date; no fact carries only an aggregator link.
• The confidence statement distinguishes verified / single-source / missing — in those words.
• The dossier answers the question written before S1, not just "information about the company".

Ja noiet greizi

Ko atstāj katrs solis

1. S1the dossier has one record: full legal name, registration number, country, legal form, status (active / liquidating / struck off), registered address and the date the register shows.
2. S2each fact has the register and the date it was read. ⚠ jāpārbauda which fields a country's register publishes free of charge and which need a paid extract — check the register's own price list, never quote a fee from memory.
3. S3the dossier says valid / invalid / not checked, with the date.
4. S4the dossier lists owners and, where published, beneficial owners — or states plainly "not published in this register" and what was tried.
5. S5the dossier has 2–3 years of the key figures as filed, or a note that nothing is filed yet (new company) or that filing is not public in that country. ⚠ jāpārbauda which company sizes file publicly in the target country — thresholds differ per country; check the register or the country's accounting rules before claiming "they hide their numbers".
6. S6each flag is marked clear / found / not checkable, with what was searched and when.
7. S7the owner has answered all three in writing in the dossier.
8. S8the dossier is filed in company-intel, linked, and the requester has received a summary of five lines or fewer: who they are, who owns them, can they pay, risk flags, confidence.

Ko saglabāt

The pinned register record with its read date · VIES result and date · ownership chain with the register for each link · financial figures as filed, with report year · flag searches named with dates · the owner's S7 decision · any paid extract ordered and its invoice id.

Kā šī procedūra uzlabojas

After every 10 runs ask: how often was the identity in S1 wrong or ambiguous, and did that ever reach S4 before being caught? Which facts later turned out wrong, and were they single-source? Did any dossier need a paid extract, and would a cheaper earlier check have settled the question? A new version changes the step that produced the wrong or unsourced fact, and says so in its change note.